4.6 Article

Engineering Zymomonas mobilis for the Production of Xylonic Acid from Sugarcane Bagasse Hydrolysate

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9071372

关键词

xylose; lignocellulosic biomass; xylonic acid; Zymomonas mobilis

资金

  1. CNPq (Brazil) [140380/2016-7]
  2. CAPES (Brazil) [PROJ-CAPESPRINT1037314P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sugarcane bagasse, a rich source of xylose, was utilized to produce xylonic acid with engineered Zymomonas mobilis. Expression of XDH gene from Paraburkholderia xenovorans led to the highest production, with deletion of xylose reductase gene further increasing yields. The findings suggest Z. mobilis could serve as a potential platform for organic acid production from cheap lignocellulosic biomass in biorefineries.
Sugarcane bagasse is an agricultural residue rich in xylose, which may be used as a feedstock for the production of high-value-added chemicals, such as xylonic acid, an organic acid listed as one of the top 30 value-added chemicals on a NREL report. Here, Zymomonas mobilis was engineered for the first time to produce xylonic acid from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate. Seven coding genes for xylose dehydrogenase (XDH) were tested. The expression of XDH gene from Paraburkholderia xenovorans allowed the highest production of xylonic acid (26.17 +/- 0.58 g L-1) from 50 g L-1 xylose in shake flasks, with a productivity of 1.85 +/- 0.06 g L-1 h(-1) and a yield of 1.04 +/- 0.04 g(AX)/g(X.) Deletion of the xylose reductase gene further increased the production of xylonic acid to 56.44 +/- 1.93 g L-1 from 54.27 +/- 0.26 g L-1 xylose in a bioreactor. Strain performance was also evaluated in sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate as a cheap feedstock, which resulted in the production of 11.13 g L-1 xylonic acid from 10 g L-1 xylose. The results show that Z. mobilis may be regarded as a potential platform for the production of organic acids from cheap lignocellulosic biomass in the context of biorefineries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据