4.6 Review

Molecular Microbial Community Analysis as an Analysis Tool for Optimal Biogas Production

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9061162

关键词

microbial diversity; next generation sequencing; proteomics; metabolomics; community diversity; anaerobic digetion; biogas

资金

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
  2. Research Council of Norway through ENERSENSE strategic research program initiative
  3. DIGI project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses the importance of microbial diversity in anaerobic digestion processes and the application of high-throughput sequencing and advanced meta-omic techniques in analyzing the dynamics of microbial processes. It also points out the necessity of providing biomarkers for AD states and developing a biomarker database.
The microbial diversity in anaerobic digestion (AD) is important because it affects process robustness. High-throughput sequencing offers high-resolution data regarding the microbial diversity and robustness of biological systems including AD; however, to understand the dynamics of microbial processes, knowing the microbial diversity is not adequate alone. Advanced meta-omic techniques have been established to determine the activity and interactions among organisms in biological processes like AD. Results of these methods can be used to identify biomarkers for AD states. This can aid a better understanding of system dynamics and be applied to producing comprehensive models for AD. The paper provides valuable knowledge regarding the possibility of integration of molecular methods in AD. Although meta-genomic methods are not suitable for on-line use due to long operating time and high costs, they provide extensive insight into the microbial phylogeny in AD. Meta-proteomics can also be explored in the demonstration projects for failure prediction. However, for these methods to be fully realised in AD, a biomarker database needs to be developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据