4.6 Article

IL-4 Drives Microglia and Macrophages Toward a Phenotype Conducive for Tissue Repair and Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury

期刊

GLIA
卷 64, 期 12, 页码 2079-2092

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.23041

关键词

IL-4; macrophage; neuroprotection; polarization; spinal cord injury

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [SAF2013-48431-R]
  2. International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia
  3. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria of Spain (TERCEL)
  4. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria of Spain (CIBERNED)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophages and microglia play a key role in the maintenance of nervous system homeostasis. However, upon different challenges, they can adopt several phenotypes, which may lead to divergent effects on tissue repair. After spinal cord injury (SCI), microglia and macrophages show predominantly pro-inflammatory activation and contribute to tissue damage. However, the factors that hamper their conversion to an anti-inflammatory state after SCI, or to other protective phenotypes, are poorly understood. Here, we show that IL-4 protein levels are undetectable in the spinal cord after contusion injury, which likely favors microglia and macrophages to remain in a pro-inflammatory state. We also demonstrate that a single delayed intraspinal injection of IL-4, 48 hours after SCI, induces increased expression of M2 marker in microglia and macrophages. We also show that delayed injection of IL-4 leads to the appearance of resolution-phase macrophages, and that IL-4 enhances resolution of inflammation after SCI. Interestingly, we provide clear evidence that delayed administration of IL-4 markedly improves functional outcomes and reduces tissue damage after contusion injury. It is possible that these improvements are mediated by the presence of macrophages with M2 markers and resolution-phase macrophages. These data suggest that therapies aimed at increasing IL-4 levels could be valuable for the treatment of acute SCI, for which there are currently no effective treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据