4.6 Article

Cathepsin S Contributes to Microglia-Mediated Olfactory Dysfunction Through the Regulation of Cx3cl1-Cx3cr1 Axis in a Niemann-Pick Disease Type C1 Model

期刊

GLIA
卷 64, 期 12, 页码 2291-2305

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.23077

关键词

Cathepsin S; olfaction; Cx3cl1-Cx3cr1 interaction; microglia; Niemann-Pick disease type C

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microglia can aggravate olfactory dysfunction by mediating neuronal death in the olfactory bulb (OB) of a murine model of Niemann-Pick disease type C1 (NPC1), a fatal neurodegenerative disorder accompanied by lipid trafficking defects. In this study, we focused on the crosstalk between neurons and microglia to elucidate the mechanisms underlying extensive microgliosis in the NPC1-affected brain. Microglia in the OB of NPC1 mice strongly expressed CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (Cx3cr1), a specific receptor for the neural chemokine C-X3-C motif ligand 1 (Cx3cl1). In addition, a high level of Cx3cl1 was detected in NPC1 mouse-derived CSF due to enhanced catalytic activity of Cathepsin S (Ctss), which is responsible for Cx3cl1 secretion. Notably, nasal delivery of Cx3cl1 neutralizing antibody or Ctss inhibitor could inhibit the Cx3cl1-Cx3cr1 interaction and support neuronal survival through the suppression of microglial activation, leading to an improvement in the olfactory function in NPC1 mice. Relevant in vitro experiments revealed that intracellular cholesterol accumulation could act as a strong inducer of abnormal Ctss activation and, in turn, stimulated the Cx3cl1-Cx3cr1 axis in microglia via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Our data address the significance of Cx3cl1-Cx3cr1 interaction in the development of microglial neurotoxicity and suggest that Ctss is a key upstream regulator. Therefore, this study contributes to a better understanding of the crosstalk between neurons and microglia in the development of the neurodegeneration and provides a new perspective for the management of olfactory deficits and other microglia-dependent neuropathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据