4.7 Article

Novel Glutamate-Putrescine Ligase Activity in Haloferax mediterranei: A New Function for glnA-2 Gene

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom11081156

关键词

glutamine synthetase; glutamate-putrescine ligase; nitrogen assimilation; putrescine; haloarchaea

资金

  1. Universidad de Alicante [VIGROB-016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study uncovers a new metabolic pathway in halophilic archaea, expanding the understanding of alternative nitrogen source utilization in this domain.
The genome of the halophilic archaea Haloferax mediterranei contains three ORFs that show homology with glutamine synthetase (GS) (glnA-1, glnA-2, and glnA-3). Previous studies have focused on the role of GlnA-1, suggesting that proteins GlnA-2 and GlnA-3 could play a different role to that of GS. Glutamine synthetase (EC 6.3.1.2) belongs to the class of ligases, including 20 subclasses of other different enzymes, such as aspartate-ammonia ligase (EC 6.3.1.1), glutamate- ethylamine ligase (EC 6.3.1.6), and glutamate-putrescine ligase (EC 6.3.1.11). The reaction catalyzed by glutamate-putrescine ligase is comparable to the reaction catalyzed by glutamine synthetase (GS). Both enzymes can bind a glutamate molecule to an amino group: ammonium (GS) or putrescine (glutamate-putrescine ligase). In addition, they present the characteristic catalytic domain of GS, showing significant similarities in their structure. Although these proteins are annotated as GS, the bioinformatics and experimental results obtained in this work indicate that the GlnA-2 protein (HFX_1688) is a glutamate-putrescine ligase, involved in polyamine catabolism. The most significant results are those related to glutamate-putrescine ligase's activity and the analysis of the transcriptional and translational expression of the glnA-2 gene in the presence of different nitrogen sources. This work confirms a new metabolic pathway in the Archaea domain which extends the knowledge regarding the utilization of alternative nitrogen sources in this domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据