4.7 Article

COVID-19 Vaccines and Thrombosis-Roadblock or Dead-End Street?

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom11071020

关键词

COVID-19; vaccines; SARS-CoV-2; thrombosis; chronic smokers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The European Medicines Agency has approved four different types of COVID-19 vaccines, which play an important role in preventing COVID-19. However, in some individuals, adverse reactions such as thrombosis with associated thrombocytopenia may occur. These events may be related to interactions between viral proteins and receptors, viral vector interactions with antibodies, and individual immune mechanisms, especially requiring validation in risk groups.
Two adenovirus-based vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2.S, and two mRNA-based vaccines, BNT162b2 and mRNA.1273, have been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and are invaluable in preventing and reducing the incidence of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Recent reports have pointed to thrombosis with associated thrombocytopenia as an adverse effect occurring at a low frequency in some individuals after vaccination. The causes of such events may be related to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interactions with different C-type lectin receptors, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and the CD147 receptor, or to different soluble splice variants of the spike protein, adenovirus vector interactions with the CD46 receptor or platelet factor 4 antibodies. Similar findings have been reported for several viral diseases after vaccine administration. In addition, immunological mechanisms elicited by viral vectors related to cellular delivery could play a relevant role in individuals with certain genetic backgrounds. Although rare, the potential COVID-19 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) requires immediate validation, especially in risk groups, such as the elderly, chronic smokers, and individuals with pre-existing incidences of thrombocytopenia; and if necessary, a reformulation of existing vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据