4.7 Review

Detection of Urinary Antibodies and Its Application in Epidemiological Studies for Parasitic Diseases

期刊

VACCINES
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9070778

关键词

noninvasive test; urine diagnosis; urine ELISA; parasite infection; neglected tropical diseases (NTDs); mass drug administration (MDA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urine samples containing high levels of antibodies for ELISA testing offer a convenient and important alternative to blood samples in epidemiological studies of infectious diseases. This method could potentially provide a safer and more accessible approach to studying diseases in the future.
For epidemiological studies of infectious diseases, pathogen-specific antibody levels in an area give us essential and appropriate information. The antibodies against pathogens are usually detected in blood, the drawing of which inconveniences people. Collection of blood increases the risk of accidental infections through blood, and it is difficult to obtain the participation of the target populations, especially the younger generation. On the other hand, urine samples, which contain a high enough level of antibodies for ELISA, can be harmlessly and easily collected and therefore have been used for epidemiological studies for diseases. The antibody examination of urine has been used for the epidemiology of parasitic diseases with a high sensitivity and specificity of serum samples. In this paper, we reviewed antibody assays with urine for seven parasitic diseases that urine diagnostic methods have reported in the past, and these are important infections included in NTDs, caused, for example, by Leishmania donovani, Wuchereria bancrofti, Schistosoma japonicum, Paragonimus westermani, Echinococcus granulosus, Echinococcus multilocularis, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Opisthorchis viverrini. The easy and safe urine surveillance system might be an admirable tool for future epidemiological studies for infectious diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据