4.7 Article

De Novo Powered Air-Purifying Respirator Design and Fabrication for Pandemic Response

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.690905

关键词

COVID-19; pandemic response; 3D-printing; powered air-purifying respirators; personal protective equipment; open source product development; injection molding; medical device design

资金

  1. MIT COVID-19 Emergency Fund
  2. Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science
  3. NIH/NCI [P30-CA006516, U54-CA225088, T32-GM007753]
  4. Harvard Ludwig Center
  5. Hugh Hampton Young Fellowship of MIT
  6. [T32-GM136577]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid spread of COVID-19 led to severe shortages of PPE, particularly devices like PAPRs. The use of open-source product development allowed for alternative sources of supply and innovation for PAPRs. Engineering testing and clinical feedback showed that the PanFab designs offer favorable alternatives in terms of user comfort, mobility, and sense of security.
The rapid spread of COVID-19 and disruption of normal supply chains has resulted in severe shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE), particularly devices with few suppliers such as powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs). A scarcity of information describing design and performance criteria for PAPRs represents a substantial barrier to mitigating shortages. We sought to apply open-source product development (OSPD) to PAPRs to enable alternative sources of supply and further innovation. We describe the design, prototyping, validation, and user testing of locally manufactured, modular, PAPR components, including filter cartridges and blower units, developed by the Greater Boston Pandemic Fabrication Team (PanFab). Two designs, one with a fully custom-made filter and blower unit housing, and the other with commercially available variants (the Custom and Commercial designs, respectively) were developed; the components in the Custom design are interchangeable with those in Commercial design, although the form factor differs. The engineering performance of the prototypes was measured and safety validated using National Institutes for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-equivalent tests on apparatus available under pandemic conditions at university laboratories. Feedback was obtained from four individuals; two clinicians working in ambulatory clinical care and two research technical staff for whom PAPR use is standard occupational PPE; these individuals were asked to compare PanFab prototypes to commercial PAPRs from the perspective of usability and suggest areas for improvement. Respondents rated the PanFab Custom PAPR a 4 to 5 on a 5 Likert-scale 1) as compared to current PPE options, 2) for the sense of security with use in a clinical setting, and 3) for comfort compared to standard, commercially available PAPRs. The three other versions of the designs (with a Commercial blower unit, filter, or both) performed favorably, with survey responses consisting of scores ranging from 3 to 5. Engineering testing and clinical feedback demonstrate that the PanFab designs represent favorable alternatives to traditional PAPRs in terms of user comfort, mobility, and sense of security. A nonrestrictive license promotes innovation in respiratory protection for current and future medical emergencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据