4.7 Article

The Regulatory Role of GBF1 on Osteoclast Activation Through EIF2a Mediated ER Stress and Novel Marker FAM129A Induction

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.706768

关键词

osteoclast; GBF1; bone; endoplasmic reticulum stress; autophagy

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2021A1515010963]
  2. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201804010009]
  3. Shenzhen Baoan District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Research Program [BAZYY20200603]
  4. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [A2021206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lack of GBF1 affects osteoclast differentiation, leading to cell swelling and reduced formation; GBF1 inhibition can intensify cellular stress and excessive autophagy, ultimately leading to cell apoptosis.
Bone-resorbing activities of osteoclasts (OCs) are highly dependent on actin cytoskeleton remodeling, plasma membrane reorganization, and vesicle trafficking pathways, which are partially regulated by ARF-GTPases. In the present study, the functional roles of Golgi brefeldin A resistance factor 1 (GBF1) are proposed. GBF1 is responsible for the activation of the ARFs family and vesicular transport at the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi interface in different stages of OCs differentiation. In the early stage, GBF1 deficiency impaired OCs differentiation and was accompanied with OCs swelling and reduced formation of mature OCs, indicating that GBF1 participates in osteoclastogenesis. Using siRNA and the specific inhibitor GCA for GBF1 knockdown upregulated endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated signaling molecules, including BiP, p-PERK, p-EIF2 alpha, and FAM129A, and promoted autophagic Beclin1, Atg7, p62, and LC3 axis, leading to apoptosis of OCs. The present data suggest that, by blocking COPI-mediated vesicular trafficking, GBF1 inhibition caused intense stress to the endoplasmic reticulum and excessive autophagy, eventually resulting in the apoptosis of mature OCs and impaired bone resorption function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据