4.7 Article

Scaling Laws for Mitotic Chromosomes

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.684278

关键词

chromosome; scaling analysis; spindle; vertebrate; angiosperm; mitosis

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [MCB-1826903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During mitosis in higher eukaryotes, chromosome condensation is co-regulated by several gene families, with chromosome size and DNA content scaling with powers close to 1/4, 1/2, and 1 across vertebrate species. The increase in chromosome cross-sectional area with length is hypothesized to be necessary to prevent large chromosome elongations that could slow or stall mitosis. Unlike angiosperms, individual vertebrate karyotypes typically exhibit a wider range of chromosome lengths.
During mitosis in higher eukaryotes, each chromosome condenses into a pair of rod-shaped chromatids. This process is co-regulated by the activity of several gene families, and the underlying biophysics remains poorly understood. To better understand the factors regulating chromosome condensation, we compiled a database of mitotic chromosome size and DNA content from the tables and figures of >200 published papers. A comparison across vertebrate species shows that chromosome width, length and volume scale with DNA content to the powers similar to 1/4, similar to 1/2, and similar to 1, respectively. Angiosperms (flowering plants) show a similar length scaling, so this result is not specific to vertebrates. Chromosome shape and size thus satisfy two conditions: (1) DNA content per unit volume is approximately constant and (2) the cross-sectional area increases proportionately with chromosome length. Since viscous drag forces during chromosome movement are expected to scale with length, we hypothesize that the cross-section increase is necessary to limit the occurrence of large chromosome elongations that could slow or stall mitosis. Lastly, we note that individual vertebrate karyotypes typically exhibit a wider range of chromosome lengths as compared with angiosperms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据