4.4 Article

Assignment of epidemiological lineages in an emerging pandemic using the pangolin tool

期刊

VIRUS EVOLUTION
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ve/veab064

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; genomic surveillance; phylogenetics; software; lineage

类别

资金

  1. Oxford Martin School
  2. Wellcome Trust [206298/Z/17/Z, 203783/Z/16/Z, 2236]
  3. European Research Council [725422-ReservoirDOCS]
  4. Wellcome Trust [206298/Z/17/Z, 203783/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global virus genomics community has responded unprecedentedly to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, leading to significant advances in 'real-time' generation and sharing of genomic data. The development of new analytical methods, such as pangolin, has been necessary to handle the rapid growth in virus genome data production. Pangolin has processed nearly two million virus genomes, aiding in SARS-CoV-2 genomic epidemiology and providing researchers with valuable information about the pandemic's transmission lineages.
The response of the global virus genomics community to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has been unprecedented, with significant advances made towards the 'real-time' generation and sharing of SARS-CoV-2 genomic data. The rapid growth in virus genome data production has necessitated the development of new analytical methods that can deal with orders of magnitude of more genomes than previously available. Here, we present and describe Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak Lineages (pangolin), a computational tool that has been developed to assign the most likely lineage to a given SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence according to the Pango dynamic lineage nomenclature scheme. To date, nearly two million virus genomes have been submitted to the web-application implementation of pangolin, which has facilitated the SARS-CoV-2 genomic epidemiology and provided researchers with access to actionable information about the pandemic's transmission lineages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据