4.8 Review

Review: 3D printing hydrogels for the fabrication of soilless cultivation substrates

期刊

APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101088

关键词

Soilless cultivation; Hydrogels; Additive manufacturing; Bioreceptivity; Phytocompatible

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust's 'Leverhulme Doctoral Scholarship Programme' [DS-2017087]
  2. Engineering and Physical Research Council [EP/L015498/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/L015498/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of hydrogels in academic research is growing rapidly and becoming more relevant to real-life applications, especially in the field of soilless cultivation substrates. Additive Manufacturing (AM) has enabled the manufacturing of hydrogel structures with customized properties, paving the way for new functionalities and applications. The challenges and future prospects of printing soilless cultivation substrates are being explored, with a focus on features similar to soil achieved through the fabrication process.
The use of hydrogels in academic research is fast evolving, and becoming more relevant to real life applications across varying fields. Additive Manufacturing (AM) has paved the way towards manufacturing hydrogel substrates with tailored properties which allow for new functionalities and applications. In this review, we introduce the idea of fabricating hydrogels as bioreceptive structures to be used as soilless cultivation substrates. AM is suggested as the fabrication process to achieve structures with features similar to soil. To evaluate this, we first review hydrogel fabrication processes, highlighting their key differences in terms of resolution, printing speed and build volume. Thus, we illustrate the examples from the literature where hydrogels were 3D printed with microorganisms such as algae. Finally, the challenges and future perspectives of printing soilless cultivation substrates are explored. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据