4.6 Review

Transmural healing as a therapeutic goal in Crohn's disease: a systematic review

期刊

LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 659-667

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00096-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transmural healing is a key factor in improving disease-related outcomes for patients with Crohn's disease, often evaluated through bowel wall thickness. Multiple studies have shown a significant association between transmural healing and improvements in disease-related outcomes, as well as a correlation with mucosal healing and selected biomarkers.
Transmural healing is associated with substantial improvements in disease-related outcomes for patients with Crohn's disease, but there is no single validated definition of transmural healing to date. We did a systematic review to summarise the available definitions and to evaluate the effect of transmural healing on disease-related outcomes for patients with Crohn's disease by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for interventional and non-interventional studies. Seventeen studies were included, reporting rates of transmural healing in between 14.0% and 42.4% of patients. Transmural healing was assessed with magnetic resonance enterography, bowel sonography, or CT enterography. Most studies used bowel wall thickness, with 3 mm or less as the most frequent cutoff, to define transmural healing. Vascularisation assessed by doppler ultrasound and absence of complications or contrast enhancement were also used for this definition. Transmural healing was significantly associated with improvements in disease-related outcomes. In addition, there was a good correlation between transmural healing, mucosal healing, and selected biomarkers. We conclude that bowel wall thickness is the most frequently used item to evaluate transmural healing, which is associated with improvements in long-term outcomes of Crohn's disease and should be considered as a new treatment target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据