4.5 Article

Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology

期刊

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 1205-1212

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01460-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center from the National Science Foundation [DBI-1639145]
  2. African Academy of Sciences - UK Government's Global Challenges Research Fund
  3. Royal Society - UK Government's Global Challenges Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Authors outline five decolonizing shifts to transform academic ecological practice, challenging the discipline to become more inclusive, creative, and ethical. Expanding knowledge and incorporating varied perspectives and approaches from the natural environment and global systems are essential to make ecology inclusive of diverse populations inhabiting Earth's ecosystems.
The authors outline five decolonizing shifts that could help to transform academic ecological practice, challenging the discipline to become more inclusive, creative and ethical. Ecological research and practice are crucial to understanding and guiding more positive relationships between people and ecosystems. However, ecology as a discipline and the diversity of those who call themselves ecologists have also been shaped and held back by often exclusionary Western approaches to knowing and doing ecology. To overcome these historical constraints and to make ecology inclusive of the diverse peoples inhabiting Earth's varied ecosystems, ecologists must expand their knowledge, both in theory and practice, to incorporate varied perspectives, approaches and interpretations from, with and within the natural environment and across global systems. We outline five shifts that could help to transform academic ecological practice: decolonize your mind; know your histories; decolonize access; decolonize expertise; and practise ethical ecology in inclusive teams. We challenge the discipline to become more inclusive, creative and ethical at a moment when the perils of entrenched thinking have never been clearer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据