4.5 Article

Implication of oxidant activation on olefin epoxidation catalysed by Molybdenum catalysts with aroylhydrazonato ligands: Experimental and theoretical studies

期刊

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
卷 512, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111764

关键词

Molybdenum; Aroylhydrazones; Epoxidation; DFT; Peroxides

资金

  1. Croatian Science Founda-tion, Croatia [IP-2016-06-4221]
  2. Croatian Government
  3. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund-Competitiveness and Cohesion Operational Programme [KK.01.1.1.02.0016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the catalytic activity of dinuclear and mononuclear molybdenum(VI) complexes with aroylhydrazonato ligands in the epoxidation of cyclooctene and oct-1-ene. Different isomers of aroylhydrazones led to specific [MoO2L] units with varying catalytic activity, with TBHP in decane providing outstanding results for cyclooctene epoxidation. DFT calculations confirmed the relationship between ligand nature and reactivity with oxidant agents TBHP and H2O2, proposing a plausible mechanism with H2O2 after considering various pathways.
Dinuclear and mononuclear molybdenum(VI) complexes with aroylhydrazonato ligands were studied as catalysts for cyclooctene and oct-1-ene epoxidation. Different isomers of the OH and NH2 functionalised aroylhydrazones led to four specific [MoO2L] units showing different catalytic activity. Three oxidants have been investigated: tert-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP) in water or in decane, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Catalytic processes with TBHP in decane provided outstanding results in the case of cyclooctene epoxidation: TOF2.5 min > 9000 with 0.25 mol % [Mo] loading. DFT calculations confirmed the relationship between the ligand nature and reactivity with TBHP and H2O2 as oxidant agents. In the case of TBHP as oxidant, calculations considered the solvent in which the oxidant is delivered to the olefin. A plausible mechanism with H2O2 has been proposed after considering various pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据