4.5 Review

Review of green diesel production from fatty acid deoxygenation over Ni-based catalysts

期刊

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
卷 523, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111696

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center of Excellence for Petroleum, Petrochemicals, and Advanced Materials, the Faculty of Engineering at Kasetsart University
  2. Kasetsart University Research Development Institute (KURDI)
  3. Research Network of NANOTEC-KU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green diesel is a second-generation biofuel developed to meet the demand for liquid fuel and the decrease in availability of fossil fuels. It can be produced via deoxygenation from various feedstocks and the reaction occurs in a multiphase system. Nickel metal catalyst has shown good performance in green diesel production.
Green diesel is a second-generation biofuel developed in response to the increasing demand for liquid fuel and the predicted decrease in the availability of fossil fuels, especially diesel as the main liquid fuel used in transportation vehicles. Green diesel can be produced via deoxygenation from various feedstocks, such as vegetable oils, animal fats, fatty acids, and waste cooking oils. Normally, the deoxygenation reaction in green diesel production occurs in a multiphase system. There are three main pathways in the liquid phase of the reaction: decarboxylation, decarbonylation, and hydrodeoxygenation, from which liquid alkane hydrocarbons can be derived, and these are known as green diesel. This review paper discusses several deoxygenation pathways in a multiphase-reaction process to produce green diesel. Nickel metal is a non-noble metal catalyst which has been confirmed from many studies for use in deoxygenation with good performance. The performance of the nickel catalyst depends on different factors including the type of catalyst support and promoter, reaction temperature, reaction pressure, and reaction time. Finally, recent progress and future trends in green diesel production are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据