4.3 Article

Complete chloroplast genome of Eucampia zodiacus (Mediophyceae, Bacillariophyta)

期刊

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PART B-RESOURCES
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 2194-2197

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1944828

关键词

Diatoms; chloroplast genome; Eucampia zodiacus

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB42000000]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences Pioneer Hundred Talents Program
  3. Taishan Scholar Project Special Fund
  4. Qingdao Innovation and Creation Plan [19-3-2-16-zhc]
  5. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-DQC023]
  6. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province [2019JZZY020706]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study constructed the complete chloroplast genome of the cosmopolitan phytoplankton species Eucampia zodiacus for the first time, revealing its close relationship with Cerataulina daemon and nearly identical gene order between the two species.
The cosmopolitan phytoplankton species Eucampia zodiacus Ehrenberg 1839 is a common harmful algal bloom (HAB) species with significant negative ecological impact. However, molecular information for this HAB species is limited. In this study, the complete chloroplast genome (cpDNA) of E. zodiacus was constructed for the first time. The circular genome was 118,107 bp in length, containing a pair of inverted repeats (IR) (6991 bp each). The overall GC content of E. zodiacus cpDNA was 31.64%. It encoded 169 genes, including 131 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 30 tRNA genes, one tmRNA gene, one ncRNA gene, and six rRNA genes in IR regions. Phylogenetic analysis using concatenated PCGs of 56 diatom cpDNAs strongly supported that E. zodiacus was closely related to Cerataulina daemon, which belongs to the same family Hemiaulaceae according to AlgaeBase. Syntenic analysis revealed nearly identical gene order between the two cpDNAs, except for an inversion in the small single-copy (SSC) region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据