4.5 Article

Estimation of ocean export production ratios based on mixed layer depth and satellite chlorophyll observations

期刊

REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101816

关键词

Marine export ratio; Mixed layer depth; Satellite chlorophyll-a; Spring phytoplankton bloom

资金

  1. Basic Study and Interdisciplinary R&D Foundation Fund of the University of Seoul, South Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed methodology combines mixed layer depths, chlorophyll-a concentrations, and a hypothetical critical depth to determine basin-wide marine export production ratios during phytoplankton bloom periods. The approach provides monthly export ratios that reflect seasonal variability of net community production with high spatial and temporal resolutions, offering a complement to methods relying on extrapolation of limited field measurements.
We introduced a simple methodology to determine basin-wide marine export production ratios during spring phytoplankton bloom periods by combining monthly varying mixed layer depths (MLD) derived from observed temperature depth profiles, satellite time series of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentrations, and hypothetical critical depth. The MLD-Chl-a based approach yielded monthly export ratios reflecting seasonal variability of net community production in correlation with the MLD variations. Regional averages of export ratio in the spring for the southern part of the East Sea (36-39 degrees N, 130-134 degrees E), North Pacific Ocean (42-45 degrees N, 151-155 degrees E), and North Atlantic Ocean (57-60 degrees N, 17-21 degrees W) are 0.44 +/- 0.22, 0.42 +/- 0.16, and 0.73 +/- 0.29, respectively, which compare favorably with prior field data. This suggests that the approach enables estimation of export production ratios with high spatial and temporal resolutions, complementing the methods that rely on extrapolation of limited field measurements to larger space and time scales. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据