4.5 Article

Grape pomace powder valorization: a novel ingredient to improve the nutritional quality of gluten-free muffins

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-021-01829-8

关键词

Grape pomace; Drying kinetic; Alternative flour; Valorization; Muffins

资金

  1. CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council, Argentina)
  2. Universidad Nacional de San Juan, Argentina (PDTS) [1054/18]
  3. ANPCyT (National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion, Argentina)-MINCyT (PICT) [1390-2017]
  4. IDEA [0272-SECITI-2019]
  5. CONICET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on the functional properties of grape pomace powders and their incorporation in gluten-free muffins, showing that the addition of grape pomace powders can improve the nutritional composition of muffins. Additionally, consumers have a high level of acceptance for these muffins.
Grape pomace powders (GPP) were obtained and used to elaborate a gluten-free premix suitable for use in culinary recipes. The grape pomace was dried at 55 and 75 degrees C and then the kinetics was studied, being the Midilli model that fitted accurately to the experimental drying data. The proximal analysis of both samples was performed, showing no significant differences between the variables studied, except for the content of crude fiber, which was higher in flours obtained at 75 degrees C. Moreover, the techno-functional properties of GPP were studied and did not present significant variation with temperature increase except to oil holding capacity (OHC). Based on the results, GPP obtained at 75 degrees C was used as an ingredient in premix formulations. The incorporation of GPP (15 and 25%) improved the nutritional composition of the muffins as their content increases, highlighting protein and crude fiber content. Likewise, these had a good level of acceptability by consumers. Taking into account grape pomace is a by-product discarded by wineries, it has a potential added value and is feasible to use as an ingredient for gluten-free muffins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据