4.4 Review

Changes of telomere status with aging: An update

期刊

GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 30-42

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12772

关键词

precancerous states; quantitative fluorescence insitu hybridization; replicative senescence; telomere; terminal restriction fragment

资金

  1. JSPS [24590468, 15K08414]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K08414, 24590468] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulated data have shown that most human somatic cells or tissues show irreversible telomere shortening with age, and that there are strong associations between telomere attrition and aging-related diseases, including cancers, diabetes and cognitive disorders. Although it has been largely accepted that telomere attrition is one of the major causes of aging-related disorders, critical aspects of telomere biology remain unresolved, especially the lack of standardized methodology for quantification of telomere length. Another frustrating issue is that no potentially promising methods for safe prevention of telomere erosion, or for telomere elongation, have been devised. Here, we review several methods for quantification of telomere length currently utilized worldwide, considering their advantages and drawbacks. We also summarize the results of our recent studies of human cells and tissues, mainly using quantitative fluorescence insitu hybridization and Southern blotting, including those derived from patients with progeria-prone Werner syndrome and trisomy 21, and several strains of induced pluripotent stem cells. We discuss the possible merits of using telomere shortness as an indicator, or a new marker, for diagnosis of precancerous states and aging-related disorders. In addition, we describe newly found factors that are thought to impact telomere dynamics, providing a new avenue for examining the unsolved issues related to telomere restoration and maintenance. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16 (Suppl. 1): 30-42.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据