4.7 Article

Compost-Based Growing Media Improved Yield of Leafy Lettuce in Pot Culture

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11091762

关键词

Lactuca sativa; food waste compost; recyclable organic materials

资金

  1. Department of Interior [TAP-Guam-UOG-2014-1]
  2. USDA/HATCH [217050]
  3. USDA/NIFA/RIIA Grant [2016-70004-25720]
  4. NIFA [2016-70004-25720, 914348] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compost-based media were found to have varying effects on the growth of leafy lettuce, with 100% compost leading to increased shoot biomass. Different cultivars and growing media affected plant growth parameters, indicating that compost containing organic materials can be an alternative to commercial media in pot culture.
Compost-based media were examined for effects on plant growth of leafy lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in pot culture. Four types of locally sourced composts were created using different proportions of wood chips from untreated pallets and mixed tropical tree debris, food waste from restaurants, and chicken manure. Compost-based media were prepared by mixing each compost with a commercial peatmoss to create 25, 50, and 100% compost-peatmoss mixtures (by volume). In Trial One, cv. Starfighter had the greatest shoot (leaves/stems) biomass when grown in 100% compost containing wood chips, food waste, and chicken manure. In Trial Two, cvs. Starfighter and New Red Fire were examined. Growing media affected all plant growth parameters including fresh and dry shoots and roots, shoot and root length, and number of leaves. Cultivar affected all except fresh root weight. Interaction effects of growing medium and cultivar type were found for fresh shoot weight, dry root weight, shoot, and root length. Regression analyses indicated increases in amount of compost in growing media increased dry shoot and root weights. Composts containing recyclable organic materials can be an alternative to commercial media in pot culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据