4.7 Article

Hot Water Rinsing and Brushing of Fresh Produce as an Alternative to Chemical Treatment after Harvest-The Story behind the Technology

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11081653

关键词

marketing; physical treatments; postharvest; prestorage; shelf life; storage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that heat treatments can effectively reduce or eliminate decay-causing agents on fruits and vegetables, whereas fungicides and pesticides used in the past have posed environmental contamination and health risks to consumers. As a result, heat treatments have been developed to control insects and pathogenic fungi on harvested produce. The Volcani Institute in Israel developed the HWRB technology in the 1990s, which has since been commercially utilized on various crops.
For decades, heat treatments have been known to reduce or eliminate decay-causing agents and slow the physiological deterioration of freshly harvested fruits and vegetables. For years, fungicides and pesticides have been used to control fungi on freshly harvested fruits and vegetables. However, these chemicals can contaminate the environment and be hazardous to those who consume fresh produce. Therefore, heat treatments, lasting only minutes or up to several days, have been developed to control insects and pathogenic fungi on fresh produce after harvest. In the 1990s, hot water rinsing and brushing (HWRB) technology to clean and disinfect fresh produce at relatively high temperatures (50 to 62 degrees C) for seconds (12-20 s) was developed at the Volcani Institute in Israel. This technology has been improved over time and is currently used commercially on several crops in Israel and elsewhere. This article discusses the development of this prestorage technology, from 1996 to 2006, and describes the effects of HWRB on the internal and external characteristics of fruits and vegetables, as well as the possible mode of action of this technology, as examined in the literature published since 1996.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据