4.5 Article

Extraction of phenol compound from Mentha piperita by ultrasonic waves based on a response surface methodology

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 613-626

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2467

关键词

antioxidant activity; extract; phenolic compound; optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the optimization of phenol compound extraction from Mentha piperita using ultrasonic waves with response surface methodology. The independent variables (time, temperature, and ethanol concentration) significantly influenced the properties and antioxidant activity of the extract. The best extraction conditions were found to be 50 minutes at 65 degrees C with a 59.6% v/v ethanol/water solution.
In this study, optimization of the extraction of phenol compounds from Mentha piperita using ultrasonic waves with response surface methodology (RSM) was assessed. In this regard, a central composite design with three independent variables of time (5, 27.5, and 50 min), temperature (25, 45, and 65 degrees C), and concentrations of ethanol in the water-ethanol solution (0%, 50%, and 100%) was used. Besides, the antioxidant activity tests (DPPH radical scavenging assay, ferric reducing antioxidant power [FRAP], and oxidative stability indexes [OSI]) were examined. Significant effects of independent variables on the extraction of phenol compound, DPPH radical scavenging power, and OSI of M. piperita extract, with the regression coefficients of 0.89, 0.92, and 0.94, respectively, were noted. However, no significant difference in terms of the FRAP among different treatments was noted. Also, the best antioxidant activity of M. piperita was obtained by using the ultrasonic wave for 50 min at 65 degrees C and 59.6% v/v ethanol/water solution. While the findings of RSM confirmed the experimental results, due to the favored properties of M. piperita extract by the proposed method, further research to investigate possible applications in the food industry is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据