Vulnerability Assessment of Pelagic Sharks in the Western North Pacific by Using an Integrated Ecological Risk Assessment

Simple Summary A new integrated ecological risk assessment (ERA) including the IUCN Red List category, the body weight variation trend of 1989-2011 with large sample size (n > 678,000), and the inflection point of population growth curve coupled with the ERA was developed to assess the impact of longline fishery on the pelagic sharks in the western North Pacific. The intrinsic rate of population growth was used to estimate the productivity, and the susceptibility was estimated by the multiplication of the catchability, selectivity, and post-capture mortality. Five groups were identified based on the cluster analysis coupling with non-parametric multi-dimensional scaling. Rigorous management measures are recommended for the scalloped hammerhead, silky, and spinner shark at highest risk, setting total allowable catch quota is recommended for the bigeye thresher, and sandbar shark, and a consistent monitoring scheme is suggested for the smooth hammerhead, shortfin mako, pelagic thresher, oceanic whitetip, and dusky shark. The vulnerability of 11 pelagic shark species caught by the Taiwanese coastal and offshore longline fisheries in the western North Pacific were assessed by an ecological risk assessment (ERA) and 10 of the 11 species was assessed by using an integrated ERA developed in this study. The intrinsic rate of population growth was used to estimate the productivity of sharks, and the susceptibility of sharks was estimated by the multiplication of the catchability, selectivity, and post-capture mortality. Three indices namely, the IUCN Red List category, the body weight variation trend, and the inflection point of population growth curve coupled with ERA were used to conduct an integrated ERA. The results indicated that the scalloped hammerhead is at the highest risk (group 1), followed by the silky shark, and the spinner shark at high risk (group 2). The bigeye thresher, and sandbar shark fall in group 3, the smooth hammerhead falls in group 4, and the shortfin mako, pelagic thresher, oceanic whitetip, and dusky shark fall in group 5. Rigorous management measures for the species in groups 1 and 2, setting total allowable catch quota for group 3, and consistent monitoring schemes for groups 4 and 5 are recommended.

Automated summary

A new integrated ecological risk assessment (ERA) was developed to assess the impact of longline fishery on pelagic sharks in the western North Pacific. The study identified five groups of pelagic shark species based on cluster analysis, and recommended rigorous management measures for species at highest risk, setting total allowable catch quota for others, and consistent monitoring scheme for additional species.