4.6 Article

This is not a pipe - But how harmful is electronic cigarette smoke?

期刊

BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 227-234

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.05.006

关键词

Electronic cigarettes; SARS-CoV-2 mutations; Cancer immunotherapy; G6PD; Epstein-Barr virus vaccine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This issue of the Biomedical Journal covers topics such as the risks of electronic cigarette smoking, variations of SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2, the impact of COVID-19 on the gastrointestinal system, the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy in elderly patients, thyroid hormone regulation of noncoding RNAs in liver tumors, and the role of G6PD in redox signaling. Additionally, it discusses the inhibitory effects of Perilla leaf extract on SARS-CoV-2, the use of artificial neural networks for diagnosing COVID-19 and predicting vaccine epitopes, differential inflammatory responses to physical effort between men and women, as well as surgical strategies for drug-resistant epilepsy, computer-supervised double-jaw surgery, dental pulp stem cell motility, and brain blood supply restoration after atherosclerotic stroke.
This issue of the Biomedical Journal tells us about the risks of electronic cigarette smoking, variations of SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2, and how COVID-19 affects the gastrointestinal system. Moreover, we learn that cancer immunotherapy seems to work well in elderly patients, how thyroid hormones regulate noncoding RNAs in a liver tumour context, and that G6PD is a double-edged sword of redox signalling. We also discover that Perilla leaf extract could inhibit SARS-CoV-2, that artificial neural networks can diagnose COVID-19 patients and predict vaccine epitopes on the Epstein-Barr Virus, and that men and women have differential inflammatory responses to physical effort. Finally, the surgical strategies for drug-resistant epilepsy, computer-supervised double-jaw surgery, dental pulp stem cell motility, and the restitution of the brain blood supply after atherosclerotic stroke are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据