4.6 Article

Fake News Data Exploration and Analytics

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 10, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10192326

关键词

detection; fake news; data exploration; analytics; machine learning; random forest; logistic regression; big data; TF-IDF; natural language processing; unstructured data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Before the internet, people relied on traditional media for news, but now with the rise of social media, the spread of fake news has become a significant issue. Machine learning models can successfully detect fake news and determine the accuracy of news in complex environments, with high accuracy rates when applied to different models.
Before the internet, people acquired their news from the radio, television, and newspapers. With the internet, the news moved online, and suddenly, anyone could post information on websites such as Facebook and Twitter. The spread of fake news has also increased with social media. It has become one of the most significant issues of this century. People use the method of fake news to pollute the reputation of a well-reputed organization for their benefit. The most important reason for such a project is to frame a device to examine the language designs that describe fake and right news through machine learning. This paper proposes models of machine learning that can successfully detect fake news. These models identify which news is real or fake and specify the accuracy of said news, even in a complex environment. After data-preprocessing and exploration, we applied three machine learning models; random forest classifier, logistic regression, and term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) vectorizer. The accuracy of the TFIDF vectorizer, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and decision tree classifier models was approximately 99.52%, 98.63%, 99.63%, and 99.68%, respectively. Machine learning models can be considered a great choice to find reality-based results and applied to other unstructured data for various sentiment analysis applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据