4.6 Article

HadithTrust: Trust Management Approach Inspired by Hadith Science for Peer-to-Peer Platforms

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10121442

关键词

peer-to-peer; distributed systems; file sharing; reputation; trust; security; Hadith

资金

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2021/204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P2P platforms require trust management systems to establish trust relationships among peers; existing systems use binary classification, but trustworthiness in reality is vague; this paper developed a novel trust management algorithm based on Hadith science, and demonstrated its superiority through experimental results.
Peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms are gaining increasing popularity due to their scalability, robustness and self-organization. In P2P systems, peers interact directly with each other to share resources or exchange services without a central authority to manage the interaction. However, these features expose P2P platforms to malicious attacks that reduce the level of trust between peers and in extreme situations, may cause the entire system to shut down. Therefore, it is essential to employ a trust management system that establishes trust relationships among peers. Current P2P trust management systems use binary categorization to classify peers as trustworthy or not trustworthy. However, in the real world, trustworthiness is a vague concept; peers have different levels of trustworthiness that affect their overall trust value. Therefore, in this paper, we developed a novel trust management algorithm for P2P platforms based on Hadith science where Hadiths are systematically classified into multiple levels of trustworthiness, based on the quality of narrator and content. To benchmark our proposed system, HadithTrust, we used two state-of-art trust management systems, EigenTrust and InterTrust, with no-trust algorithm as a baseline scenario. Various experimental results demonstrated the superiority of HadithTrust considering eight performance measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据