4.6 Article

Simulation and Optimisation of Integrated Anaerobic-Aerobic Bioreactor (IAAB) for the Treatment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9071124

关键词

palm oil mill effluent (POME); anaerobic; aerobic; biogas; optimisation

资金

  1. HICoE-Center for Biofuel and Biochemical Research [015MA0-052]
  2. Universitas Islam Riau (UIR), Indonesia [015ME0-164]
  3. Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia [015ME0-196]
  4. Research Collaboration Grant UTP-UMP-UMT-UCTS [015MD0-019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces an innovative hybrid technology for treating palm oil mill effluent, which can increase biogas yield while reducing costs and has been proven to be economically feasible.
Y This study highlights an innovative piece of hybrid technology, whereby the combination of anaerobic and aerobic processes into a single reactor, namely, the integrated anaerobic-aerobic bioreactor (IAAB) can surpass the limits of conventional methods treating palm oil mill effluent (POME). Optimisation of IAAB using SuperPro Designer V9 simulator for maximum biogas yield while addressing its economic and environmental trade-offs was conducted for the first time. Parameters such as hydraulic retention time (HRT) and organic loading rate (OLR) were optimised in the anaerobic compartment from 10 days and 6.2 g COD/L day to 9 days and 6.9 g COD/L day, respectively. Furthermore, sludge recycle ratio was optimised from 20% to 50% in the aerobic compartment. The optimisation was successful where the biogas yield increased from 0.24 to 0.29 L CH4/g CODremoved with excellent Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) removal efficiencies up to 99% with 5.8% lower net expenditure. This simulation results were comparable against the pre-commercialized IAAB with 11.4% increase in methane yield after optimisation. Economic analysis had proven the optimised process to be feasible, resulting in return on investment (ROI), payback time, and internal rate of return (IRR) of 24.5%, 4.1 years, and 17.9%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据