4.6 Article

Effects of Different Winemaking Yeasts on the Composition of Aroma-Active Compounds and Flavor of the Fermented Jujube Wine

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9060970

关键词

jujube wine; aroma-active compounds; quality attributes; fermentation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

资金

  1. Taishan Industry Leader [LJNY202001]
  2. National key R&D plan of the 14th five year plan [2017YFD0400104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selection of optimal starter winemaking yeasts plays a crucial role in the composition of aroma-active compounds and flavor quality of jujube wine. Esters have significant contributions to wine quality attributes, especially in improving aroma. The composition of aroma-active compounds has a great impact on the flavor quality of jujube wine.
For the winemaking bioprocess of jujube wine, the selection of optimal starter cultures is one of the major concerns before fermentation. In this study, we investigated the effects of different winemaking yeasts on the composition of aroma-active compounds in the fermented jujube wine and identified the principal components that determine the flavor quality. It showed that the starter winemaking yeasts produced a total of 43 aroma-active compounds, of which esters (e.g., ethyl caprylate, ethyl decanoate, ethyl hexanoate, and phenethyl acetate) contribute more to the wine quality attributes, especially for the improvement of the aroma. Moreover, the composition of aroma-active compounds, for example, the ratio of the content of esters and alcohols, exerts a great impact on the flavor quality of jujube wine. Different starter winemaking yeasts resulted in significant differences in the composition (both species and content) of aroma-active compounds, and thus formed different flavors in the jujube wine. Thus, we propose that screening of a desirable starter winemaking yeast is essential before the fermentation of jujube wine at a large scale, and more considerations should be taken into the resulting composition of aroma-active compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据