4.6 Article

Optimization of the Tracer Particle Addition Method for PIV Flowmeters

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9091614

关键词

tracer particles; PIV; flowmeter; natural gas

资金

  1. Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2020YFH0135]
  2. Fluid Machinery and Engineering Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province open fund [szjj2019-023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compares and analyzes the method of filling tracer particles in different ways to optimize PIV flowmeter measurements of natural gas, and finds that filling particles in L pipes can improve measurement accuracy. The optimized structure was successfully applied to measurements of different flow rates, significantly improving metering deviation.
When a PIV flowmeter is used to measure a large flow of natural gas, the flow field fluctuation and particle distribution have a significant influence on the measurement accuracy and the particle injection mode plays a key role in the flow field fluctuation and particle distribution. To improve the measurement accuracy of PIV flowmeters, the method of filling tracer particles in single pipes, multiple pipes, and L pipes of a natural gas DN100 pipeline under high-pressure working conditions was compared and analyzed through numerical calculation and testing. The results show that the disturbance distance of filling particles in L pipes was the shortest, but the particle distribution area was small, whereas the flow metering error was large. By shortening the intersection distance between the L tube injection flow field and the main flow field, the problem that the particles failed to fill the test area was effectively solved, and the peak turbulence intensity at the intersection of the flow field decreased from 13.4% to 8%. Furthermore, the optimized structure was used to measure a flow of 100-600 m(3)/h with different flow rates. The relative error between the flowmeter and the ultrasonic flowmeter was approximately 2%, and the metering deviation was significantly improved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据