4.6 Article

CFD Study of the Numbering up of Membrane Microreactors for CO2 Capture

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr9091515

关键词

CO2 capture; membrane; microreactor; numbering up; CFD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to design a numbering-up/scale-out membrane microreactor as a capture system for CO2 removal. While nearly uniform flow distribution was achieved in the CFD models, slightly uneven distribution was observed in the experimental system. By installing inserts with different channel widths, the experimental results were improved compared to the original case.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the major atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG). The continuous increase of CO2 concentration and its long atmospheric lifetime may cause long-term negative effects on the climate. It is important to develop technologies to capture and minimize those emissions into the atmosphere. The objective of this work is to design and study theoretically and experimentally a numbering-up/scale-out membrane microreactor in order to be used as a capture system. The main aim of the work is to obtain an even flow distribution at each plate of the reactor. Nearly uniform flow distribution was achieved at each layer of the numbering-up microreactor according to the carried-out CFD models. The maximum difference between the average velocities was less than 6% for both gas and liquid flows. To obtain better flow distribution into the microreactor, the radius of the inlet/outlet tube was optimized. Results from CFD and experimental simulations do not match, and slightly maldistribution in achieved in the experimental system due to phase breakthrough and imperfections on the fabrication of the plates. Moreover, comparing the single channel microreactor to the scale-out microreactor, the latter showed poorer performance on CO2 removal while expecting the reactors to have similar performance. By installing inserts with different channel widths, the experimental results were identical to the original case.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据