4.7 Article

Experimental Investigation of Wettability Alteration from Water-wet to Oil-wet During Oil Migration

期刊

NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 3735-3746

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11053-021-09906-5

关键词

Wettability; Calcite; Carboxylic acid; Enhanced oil recovery; Saline water injection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the wettability alteration of the calcite surface using different aqueous phases and advanced surface analysis tools. The results showed significant effects of different aqueous phases on surface adsorption of carboxylic components, with the adsorption controlled by interactions of negative ions formed during carboxylic acid dissociation with positive salt ions in brine solvents.
Most oil reservoirs are first saturated with water and become oil-wet gradually due to oil migration and accumulation. Previous studies reported that the adsorption of hydrocarbon components onto the rock surface during a considerable time caused wettability alteration from primarily water-wet to oil-wet. However, few studies fundamentally reviewed the effects of the ionic composition of formation water on the process of the rock surface wettability alteration from water-wet to oil-wet using advanced surface analysis tools. In this research, wettability alteration of calcite surface from water-wet to oil-wet and (in the next step) from oil-wet to water-wet was studied using a specific carboxylic acid (stearic acid), normal decane, and three single salt aqueous phases. During this research, the surface was analyzed using contact angle and scanning electronic microscopy. Results showed that using deionized water as an aqueous phase caused maximum surface adsorption of carboxylic components and minimum adsorption occurred in the presence of the MgCl2 aqueous phase. The carboxylic acid adsorption onto the calcite surface was controlled by interactions of negative ions formed during dissociation of carboxylic acids and positive salt ions present in brine solvents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据