4.5 Article

Reactivation Potential of Intraplate Faults in the Western Quebec Seismic Zone, Eastern Canada

期刊

EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021EA001825

关键词

slip tendency; western Quebec seismic zone; intraplate faults; eastern Canada; fault reactivation

资金

  1. Keith MacDonald structural geology advancement fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the modern seismicity within the intraplate western Quebec seismic zone, identifying that NNW-SSE to NW-SE striking faults have the highest slip tendency values. The research also highlights key areas for future investigations and demonstrates the applicability of slip tendency analysis in identifying potentially active faults in stable continental regions worldwide.
The intraplate western Quebec seismic zone (WQSZ) in eastern Canada experiences moderate seismicity that mainly results from reactivation of inherited structures under the present-day, NE-SW-striking regional maximum horizontal stress (S-H) and, possibly to a minor extent, through stress perturbations in response to glacio-isostatic adjustment. This work comprises the first numerical stress simulation-based study that predicts the preferred spatial distribution, trends, and sense of slip of contemporary fault reactivation, which may have implications for possible fault segmentation patterns in the WQSZ. We show that mostly NNW-SSE to NW-SE-striking faults exhibit the highest slip tendency values. Spatial patterns of slip tendency and kinematics of reactivation are consistent with the observed seismicity. In an area where Quaternary-active faults have yet to be systematically identified, we have narrowed down areas to focus on for more detailed, future neotectonic investigations that could provide sound foundation for seismic hazard assessments. This study demonstrates the applicability of slip tendency analysis to identifying potentially active faults in stable continental regions worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据