4.5 Article

A Guide to Using GitHub for Developing and Versioning Data Standards and Reporting Formats

期刊

EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021EA001797

关键词

FAIR data; TRUST principles; open science; metadata; data repositories

资金

  1. ESS-DIVE repository by the U.S. DOE's Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0012704]
  3. ESS-DIVE's Community Funds, through the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the Department of Energy, Office of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data standardization and descriptive metadata are crucial for data reuse, aligning with the ultimate goal of the FAIR principles. The collaboration-driven approach in creating community data standards emphasizes sharing information and receiving feedback. Using GitHub as a version control platform is common, but there is a lack of universally accepted methodology for developing and publishing data standards.
Data standardization combined with descriptive metadata facilitate data reuse, which is the ultimate goal of the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles. Community data or metadata standards are increasingly created through an approach that emphasizes collaboration between various stakeholders. Such an approach requires platforms for collaboration on the development process that centers on sharing information and receiving feedback. Our objective in this study was to conduct a systematic review to identify data standards and reporting formats that use version control for developing data standards and to summarize common practices, particularly in earth and environmental sciences. Out of 108 data standards and reporting formats identified in our review, 32 used GitHub as the version control platform, and no other platforms were used. We found no universally accepted methodology for developing and publishing data standards. Many GitHub repositories did not use key features that could help developers to gather user feedback, or to create and revise standards that build on previous work. We provide guidance for community-driven standard development and associated documentation on GitHub based on a systematic review of existing practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据