4.5 Article

Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe

期刊

NEOBIOTA
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 153-190

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.67.58196

关键词

Bodiversity; European Union; InvaCost; monetary impacts; non-native biota; socio-economic correlates; socioeconomic sectors

资金

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-14-CE02-0021]
  2. BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative
  3. AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology
  4. BiodivERsA
  5. EXPRO (Czech Science Foundation) [19-28807X]
  6. Czech Academy of Sciences [RVO 67985939]
  7. Portuguese National Funds through Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [CEECIND/02037/2017, UIDB/00295/2020, UIDP/00295/2020]
  8. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  9. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [747120]
  10. BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum Project Alien Scenarios [BMBF/PT DLR 01LC1807C]
  11. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-04-01029-A]
  12. Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS [0287-2021-0011]
  13. AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology of University Paris Saclay
  14. Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios
  15. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [747120] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is the first comprehensive effort to quantify the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examine temporal trends in these data. The total costs of IAS in Europe amounted to US$140.20 billion between 1960 and 2020, with significant impacts in large western and central European countries. Temporally, invasion costs have exponentially increased through time, reaching up to US$23.58 billion in 2013 and an extrapolated US$139.56 billion in impacts in 2020.
Biological invasions continue to threaten the stability of ecosystems and societies that are dependent on their services. Whilst the ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) have been widely reported in recent decades, there remains a paucity of information concerning their economic impacts. Europe has strong trade and transport links with the rest of the world, facilitating hundreds of IAS incursions, and largely centralised decision-making frameworks. The present study is the first comprehensive and detailed effort that quantifies the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examines temporal trends in these data. In addition, the distributions of costs across countries, socioeconomic sectors and taxonomic groups are examined, as are socio-economic correlates of management and damage costs. Total costs of IAS in Europe summed to US$140.20 billion (or euro116.61 billion) between 1960 and 2020, with the majority (60%) being damage-related and impacting multiple sectors. Costs were also geographically widespread but dominated by impacts in large western and central European countries, i.e. the UK, Spain, France, and Germany. Human population size, land area, GDP, and tourism were significant predictors of invasion costs, with management costs additionally predicted by numbers of introduced species, research effort and trade. Temporally, invasion costs have increased exponentially through time, with up to US$23.58 billion (euro19.64 billion) in 2013, and US$139.56 billion (euro116.24 billion) in impacts extrapolated in 2020. Importantly, although these costs are substantial, there remain knowledge gaps on several geographic and taxonomic scales, indicating that these costs are severely underestimated. We, thus, urge increased and improved cost reporting for economic impacts of IAS and coordinated international action to prevent further spread and mitigate impacts of IAS populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据