4.5 Article

Economic costs of invasive species in Germany

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide

Christophe Diagne et al.

Summary: Biological invasions have led to significant impacts on global economy and biodiversity, with costs showing a rapid increase over time. The study reveals that the damage costs of biological invasions are significantly higher than management expenditures, highlighting the need for further improvement in research methods.

NATURE (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050

Hanno Seebens et al.

Summary: The study used a new model to simulate future numbers of alien species and projected a 36% increase in established alien species numbers per continent from 2005 to 2050. Particularly strong increases were projected for Europe, followed by North America, South America, and Asia, while a decline in growth rate was projected for Australasia.

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Two centuries for an almost complete community turnover from native to non-native species in a riverine ecosystem

Phillip J. Haubrock et al.

Summary: The study in the inner-Florentine stretch of the Arno River in Italy revealed a nearly complete turnover from native to non-native species in both fish and selected macroinvertebrate groups over a period of 215 years. While the overall alpha-diversity of both communities increased significantly, the functional richness and divergence of fish and macroinvertebrate communities only decreased slightly. The introductions of non-native species occurred outside the niche space of native species, with non-natives eventually replacing native species in both fish and macroinvertebrate communities.

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Global economic costs of aquatic invasive alien species

Ross N. Cuthbert et al.

Summary: Research indicates that the global economic cost of aquatic invasive alien species has reached $345 billion, with the majority attributed to invertebrates, vertebrates, and plants. The highest costs were reported in North America and Asia, primarily due to resource damages. The costs of aquatic invasive species have increased exponentially in recent decades, but are likely underreported.

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Non-English languages enrich scientific knowledge: The example of economic costs of biological invasions

Elena Angulo et al.

Summary: The study suggests that focusing exclusively on the English language in scientific research may hinder effective communication between scientists and practitioners or policymakers whose native language is non-English, leading to biases and knowledge gaps in global science fields. Combining data from non-English sources enhances data completeness, alleviates biases in understanding invasion costs globally, improves management performance and coordination among experts, and strengthens collaborative actions across countries.

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide

Christophe Diagne et al.

Summary: The study reveals that biological invasions have caused significant economic losses, with costs estimated to be continuously increasing and in need of further research improvement. It calls for consistent management actions and international policy agreements to reduce the burden of invasive alien species.

NATURE (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Detailed assessment of the reported economic costs of invasive species in Australia

Corey J. A. Bradshaw et al.

Summary: The legacy of deliberate and accidental introductions of invasive alien species to Australia has resulted in significant economic costs, with at least $298.58 billion (2017 value) spent or lost since the 1960s. Costs have been increasing at an average rate of 1.8-6.3 times per decade, with plants being the primary contributors to the total costs. Different regions in Australia face major costs from different species, but most losses are caused by one to three species.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic impact of invasive alien species in Argentina: a first national synthesis

Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra et al.

Summary: This study provides the first analysis of the economic cost of invasive alien species (IAS) in Argentina at the national level, using the InvaCost database. It found that the reported costs of IAS in Argentina are high, yet likely underestimated due to important data gaps and biases in the literature.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic costs of invasive alien species in Mexico

Axel Eduardo Rico-Sanchez et al.

Summary: This study utilized data from the InvaCost project to quantify and describe the economic costs of invasions in Mexico. The costs of invasions in Mexico were split between aquatic and terrestrial invaders, with costs from damages to resources four times higher than those from management of IAS.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic costs of biological invasions in Asia

Chunlong Liu et al.

Summary: In recent years, invasive species have caused economic losses in Asia totaling US$ 432.6 billion, with the highest costs attributed to insects and mammals, and India and China bearing the highest costs. However, economic cost estimations are lacking for most Asian countries and for over 96% of introduced species in Asia.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic costs of invasive alien species in Spain

Elena Angulo et al.

Summary: Economic assessments of invasive alien species in Spain have shown a significant increase in costs in recent years, with a majority of the expenses allocated to management actions rather than damage. Regional and inter-regional administrations are responsible for the majority of these costs, highlighting the need for more focus on prevention rather than post-invasion management in line with international guidelines.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

The economic costs of biological invasions in Brazil: a first assessment

Jose Ricardo Pires Adelino et al.

Summary: Biological invasions are a significant driver of global environmental change, impacting biodiversity, ecosystem services, human health, and the economy. Brazil has over 1200 known alien species, with 460 recognized as invasive. The economic costs of biological invasions in Brazil have been substantial, with a majority spent on damages rather than prevention and management.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic costs of biological invasions within North America

Robert Crystal-Ornelas et al.

Summary: Invasive species have caused significant economic losses in North America, with costs increasing over the years from an average of $2 billion per year in the 1960s to over $26 billion per year in the 2010s. The United States has incurred the highest costs among North American countries, even after accounting for research efforts.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Biological invasions in France: Alarming costs and even more alarming knowledge gaps

David Renault et al.

Summary: The increasing number of introduced species poses a serious threat to global biodiversity, with France experiencing both economic losses and management costs due to invasive alien species. Insects and plants are the main contributors to the high economic costs, with significant gaps in cost data for the majority of alien species in France. This highlights the urgent need for improved biosecurity measures and better documentation of cost data.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic costs of biological invasions in the United Kingdom

Ross N. Cuthbert et al.

Summary: In the UK, invasive alien species have cost the economy between US$6.9 billion and $17.6 billion since 1976. The costs of invasion have been increasing rapidly, averaging $157.1 million per annum. This highlights the need for greater investments in research and management of invasive species in the country.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe

Phillip J. Haubrock et al.

Summary: This study is the first comprehensive effort to quantify the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examine temporal trends in these data. The total costs of IAS in Europe amounted to US$140.20 billion between 1960 and 2020, with significant impacts in large western and central European countries. Temporally, invasion costs have exponentially increased through time, reaching up to US$23.58 billion in 2013 and an extrapolated US$139.56 billion in impacts in 2020.

NEOBIOTA (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Biological weed control to relieve millions from Ambrosia allergies in Europe

Urs Schaffner et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2020)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

InvaCost, a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide

C. Diagne et al.

SCIENTIFIC DATA (2020)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

The importance of assessing positive and beneficial impacts of alien species

Giovanni Vimercati et al.

NEOBIOTA (2020)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Public perception of river fish biodiversity in four European countries

Sophia Kochalski et al.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2019)

Article Ecology

Alien versus native species as drivers of recent extinctions

Tim M. Blackburn et al.

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (2019)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

The economic benefits of invasive species management

Nick Hanley et al.

PEOPLE AND NATURE (2019)

Review Ecology

Risks to pollinators and pollination from invasive alien species

Adam J. Vanbergen et al.

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Data Descriptor: Introducing the Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species

Shyama Pagad et al.

SCIENTIFIC DATA (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide

Hanno Seebens et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2017)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Global threat to agriculture from invasive species

Dean R. Paini et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2016)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities

Regan Early et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2016)

Article Plant Sciences

Biological Flora of the British Isles: Ambrosia artemisiifolia

Franz Essl et al.

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY (2015)

Article Fisheries

Explaining participation rates in recreational fishing across industrialised countries

R. Arlinghaus et al.

FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY (2015)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Will climate change promote future invasions?

Celine Bellard et al.

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY (2013)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

How much is Europe spending on invasive alien species?

Riccardo Scalera

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS (2010)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Invasive Species and Biodiversity Crises: Testing the Link in the Late Devonian

Alycia L. Stigall

PLOS ONE (2010)

Article Industrial Relations & Labor

Cross-border competition and trade union responses in the enlarged EU: Evidence from the automotive industry in Germany and Poland

Magdalena Bernaciak

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (2010)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization

Philip E. Hulme

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2009)

Article Parasitology

Spread of ticks and tick-borne diseases in Germany due to global warming

Kathrin Hartelt et al.

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH (2008)

Review Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science

Animal welfare perspectives on recreational angling

Steven J. Cooke et al.

APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE (2007)

Article Ecology

Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change?

RK Didham et al.

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2005)