4.5 Article

Urinary exosome microRNA signatures as a noninvasive prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer

期刊

NPJ GENOMIC MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00212-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07048552, 2017R1E1A1A01074913, 2019R1A5A2027588]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07048552, 2017R1E1A1A01074913] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified urinary exosomal miRNAs miR-21, miR-451, and miR-636 as potential markers for predicting metastasis in prostate cancer. A PCa-MRS model was developed based on these miRNAs, showing superior stratification power and significant association with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Predicting the risk of metastasis before starting prostate cancer (PCa) treatment can minimize the overtreatment of indolent cases and help choosing appropriate treatment. The levels of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) from body fluids can be used as noninvasive prognostic biomarkers. In this study, urinary exosomal miRNA expression profiles of 149 PCas were determined and the miRNAs associated with metastasis were identified: miR-21, miR-16, miR-142-3p, miR-451, and miR-636. When evaluating clinical factors together, miR-21, miR-451, miR-636, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level remained significant in the multivariate analysis. Based on them, we developed a Prostate Cancer Metastasis Risk Scoring (PCa-MRS) model. The PCa-MRS showed superior stratification power (AUC = 0.925) to preoperative PSA or clinical Gleason score. Patients with high scores showed significantly poorer biochemical recurrence-free survival than those with low scores (P = 6.53 x 10(-10)). Our results showed the potential of urinary exosomal miRNAs as noninvasive markers for predicting metastasis and prognosis in PCa patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据