4.7 Article

Nanoencapsulated Doxorubicin Prevents Mucositis Development in Mice

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071021

关键词

nanostructured lipid carriers; doxorubicin; mucositis

资金

  1. FAPEMIG [APQ-00085-13]
  2. CAPES
  3. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loading DOX into nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) successfully reduced the drug toxicity to mucosal structures and attenuated DOX-induced mucositis in mice. NLC-DOX showed stable drug release capabilities, improved intestinal barrier function, alleviated inflammation, and may offer a new solution for the side effects of chemotherapy treatments.
Doxorubicin (DOX), a chemotherapy drug successfully used in the therapy of various types of cancer, is currently associated with the mucositis development, an inflammation that can cause ulcerative lesions in the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, abdominal pain and secondary infections. To increase the safety of the chemotherapy, we loaded DOX into nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs). The NLC-DOX was characterized by HPLC, DLS, NTA, Zeta potential, FTIR, DSC, TEM and cryogenic-TEM. The ability of NLC-DOX to control the DOX release was evaluated through in vitro release studies. Moreover, the effect of NLC-DOX on intestinal mucosa was compared to a free DOX solution in C57BL/6 mice. The NLC-DOX showed spherical shape, high drug encapsulation efficiency (84.8 +/- 4.6%), high drug loading (55.2 +/- 3.4 mg/g) and low average diameter (66.0-78.8 nm). The DSC and FTIR analyses showed high interaction between the NLC components, resulting in controlled drug release. Treatment with NLC-DOX attenuated DOX-induced mucositis in mice, improving shortening on villus height and crypt depth, decreased inflammatory parameters, preserved intestinal permeability and increased expression of tight junctions (ZO-1 and Ocludin). These results indicated that encapsulation of DOX in NLCs is viable and reduces the drug toxicity to mucosal structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据