4.7 Article

Targeted Delivery of Liposomal Temozolomide Enhanced Anti-Glioblastoma Efficacy through Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081270

关键词

glioblastoma; blood-brain barrier; ultrasound; temozolomide; liposome

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0115900, 2020YFA0908800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871376, 81660381]
  3. Guangdong Innovation Platform of Translational Research for Cerebrovascular Diseases
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20180507182420114, JCYJ20190812171820731, ZDSYS201802061806314]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ultrasound-mediated BBB opening combined with liposomal temozolomide formulation has been successfully applied in the treatment of glioblastoma, significantly inhibiting tumor growth and prolonging animal survival time without significant side effects.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the commonest form of primary brain tumor in the central nervous system, with median survival below 15 months and only a 25% two-year survival rate for patients. One of the major clinical challenges in treating GBM is the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which greatly limits the availability of therapeutic drugs to the tumor. Ultrasound-mediated BBB opening provides a promising approach to help deliver drugs to brain tumors. The use of temozolomide (TMZ) in the clinical treatment of GBM has been shown to be able to increase survival in patients with GBM, but this improvement is still trivial. In this study, we developed a liposomal temozolomide formulation (TMZ-lipo) and locally delivered these nanoparticles into GBM through ultrasound-mediated BBB opening technology, significantly suppressing tumor growth and prolonging tumor-bearing animal survival. No significant side effects were observed in comparison with control rats. Our study provides a novel strategy to improve the efficacy of TMZ against GBM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据