4.6 Article

c-Src Increases the Sensitivity to TKIs in the EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.602900

关键词

c-Src; caspase-8; non-small cell lung cancer; tyrosine kinase inhibitor; resistance

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81301847, 81872390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

c-Src activation facilitates metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma through a specific mechanism; although c-Src is not involved in EGFR-related signaling, dasatinib can enhance the anti-tumor activity of TKIs; dasatinib-induced c-Src inactivation sensitizes EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma to TKIs.
c-Src and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are key apical kinases that govern cell responses to microenvironmental cues. How c-Src affects EGFR-related signaling and targeted therapy remains elusive. Initially, caspase-8 phosphorylated at tyrosine 380 by c-Src predominantly enhancing c-Src activation to facilitate metastasis through attaining epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype in lung adenocarcinoma. Mechanistically, the linkage of c-Src SH2 domain with phosphotyrosine 380 of caspase-8 and SH3 domain with PDEP motif of caspase-8 overactivates c-Src as compared with other c-Src-partner proteins. c-Src is incapable of triggering EGFR-related signaling. This is reflected by the levels of phosphotyrosine 1068, 1086, and 1145, which have no impact on c-Src activation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) suppress EGFR-related signaling to yield cell deaths of lung adenocarcinoma by both necroptosis and intrinsic apoptosis. Given that c-Src activation is frequent in lung adenocarcinoma, blocking c-Src activation through dasatinib can seal the survival-signaling-related phosphotyrosines of EGFR by its SH2 domain, which in turn increases the antitumor activity of TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Collectively, c-Src inactivation by dasatinib administration sensitizes EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma to TKIs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据