4.7 Review

Applications and developments of gene therapy drug delivery systems for genetic diseases

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 687-703

出版社

SHENYANG PHARMACEUTICAL UNIV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2021.05.003

关键词

Gene therapy drugs; Viral vectors; Non-viral vectors; Genetic diseases; Nano-delivery system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472115]
  2. Double First class Innovation Team of China Pharmaceutical University [CPU2018GY40]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic diseases pose a serious threat to human health and gene therapy drugs show great potential in treating them; while viral vectors are commonly used for gene therapy delivery, novel nanocarriers are gradually replacing them for superior performance.
Genetic diseases seriously threaten human health and have always been one of the refractory conditions facing humanity. Currently, gene therapy drugs such as siRNA, shRNA, antisense oligonucleotide, CRISPR/Cas9 system, plasmid DNA and miRNA have shown great potential in biomedical applications. To avoid the degradation of gene therapy drugs in the body and effectively deliver them to target tissues, cells and organelles, the development of excellent drug delivery vehicles is of utmost importance. Viral vectors are the most widely used delivery vehicles for gene therapy in vivo and in vitro due to their high transfection efficiency and stable transgene expression. With the development of nanotechnology, novel nanocarriers are gradually replacing viral vectors, emerging superior performance. This review mainly illuminates the current widely used gene therapy drugs, summarizes the viral vectors and non-viral vectors that deliver gene therapy drugs, and sums up the application of gene therapy to treat genetic diseases. Additionally, the challenges and opportunities of the field are discussed from the perspective of developing an effective nano-delivery system. (C) 2021 Shenyang Pharmaceutical University. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据