4.6 Article

Establishment and Characterization of a Novel Gill Cell Line, LG-1, from Atlantic Lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus L.)

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10092442

关键词

cleaner fish; lumpfish; respiration; epithelial; endothelial; virus; animal welfare; 3R; medical delousing; marine fish

资金

  1. Norwegian Veterinary Institute internal strategic initiative BIO-Direct: Biomarkers and Bioassays for Veterinary Research and Diagnostics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The establishment of the first Lumpfish Gill cell line (LG-1) provides valuable insights into the biology of lumpfish, with the cells originating from an epithelial or endothelial cell type. LG-1 can serve as an important in vitro research tool for studying gill cell function and host-pathogen interactions in lumpfish.
The use of lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) as a cleaner fish to fight sea lice infestation in farmed Atlantic salmon has become increasingly common. Still, tools to increase our knowledge about lumpfish biology are lacking. Here, we successfully established and characterized the first Lumpfish Gill cell line (LG-1). LG-1 are adherent, homogenous and have a flat, stretched-out and almost transparent appearance. Transmission electron microscopy revealed cellular protrusions and desmosome-like structures that, together with their ability to generate a transcellular epithelial/endothelial resistance, suggest an epithelial or endothelial cell type. Furthermore, the cells exert Cytochrome P450 1A activity. LG-1 supported the propagation of several viruses that may lead to severe infectious diseases with high mortalities in fish farming, including viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) and infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV). Altogether, our data indicate that the LG-1 cell line originates from an epithelial or endothelial cell type and will be a valuable in vitro research tool to study gill cell function as well as host-pathogen interactions in lumpfish.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据