4.6 Review

Role of Glycoproteins during Fruit Ripening and Seed Development

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10082095

关键词

fruit ripening; glycoproteins; N-glycosylation; seed development; quality fruit

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID, Chile) [190093, 190078, 1211057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycosylation is a crucial protein modification that affects cellular processes such as differentiation, development, and immune response. Research focuses on its role in plant development, analyzing tools, and literature regarding fruit ripening. More studies on protein glycosylation are needed to clarify its specific role in posttranslational processes and its impact on normal fruit development and ripening.
Approximately thirty percent of the proteins synthesized in animal or plant cells travel through the secretory pathway. Seventy to eighty percent of those proteins are glycosylated. Thus, glycosylation is an important protein modification that is related to many cellular processes, such as differentiation, recognition, development, signal transduction, and immune response. Additionally, glycosylation affects protein folding, solubility, stability, biogenesis, and activity. Specifically, in plants, glycosylation has recently been related to the fruit ripening process. This review aims to provide valuable information and discuss the available literature focused on three principal topics: (I) glycosylations as a key posttranslational modification in development in plants, (II) experimental and bioinformatics tools to analyze glycosylations, and (III) a literature review related to glycosylations in fruit ripening. Based on these three topics, we propose that it is necessary to increase the number of studies related to posttranslational modifications, specifically protein glycosylation because the specific role of glycosylation in the posttranslational process and how this process affects normal fruit development and ripening remain unclear to date.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据