4.6 Review

Fisher vs. the Worms: Extraordinary Sex Ratios in Nematodes and the Mechanisms that Produce Them

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10071793

关键词

sex ratio; sperm competition; meiosis; local mate competition; nematodes

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1755379]
  2. NSF [IOS-1122101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses how anisogamy leads to the emergence of separate sexes in multicellular organisms and introduces the phenomenon of sperm competition. In large populations, the sex ratio tends towards unity, while in small inbred populations, skewed sex ratios can occur. Recent research has revealed the mechanisms underlying highly skewed sex ratios in nematodes.
Parker, Baker, and Smith provided the first robust theory explaining why anisogamy evolves in parallel in multicellular organisms. Anisogamy sets the stage for the emergence of separate sexes, and for another phenomenon with which Parker is associated: sperm competition. In outcrossing taxa with separate sexes, Fisher proposed that the sex ratio will tend towards unity in large, randomly mating populations due to a fitness advantage that accrues in individuals of the rarer sex. This creates a vast excess of sperm over that required to fertilize all available eggs, and intense competition as a result. However, small, inbred populations can experience selection for skewed sex ratios. This is widely appreciated in haplodiploid organisms, in which females can control the sex ratio behaviorally. In this review, we discuss recent research in nematodes that has characterized the mechanisms underlying highly skewed sex ratios in fully diploid systems. These include self-fertile hermaphroditism and the adaptive elimination of sperm competition factors, facultative parthenogenesis, non-Mendelian meiotic oddities involving the sex chromosomes, and environmental sex determination. By connecting sex ratio evolution and sperm biology in surprising ways, these phenomena link two seminal contributions of G. A. Parker.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据