4.6 Review

Interplay between Neutrophils, NETs and T-Cells in SARS-CoV-2 Infection-A Missing Piece of the Puzzle in the COVID-19 Pathogenesis?

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10071817

关键词

COVID-19; immunity; SARS-CoV-2; NET; neutrophil; T cells

资金

  1. National Centre For Research and Development [SZPITALE-JEDNOIMIENNE/27/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the end of 2019, a new and dangerous virus has caused over 3 million deaths worldwide. Efforts to combat the disease are multifaceted, but uncertainties remain, particularly in reducing mortality rates among critically ill patients. Researchers are exploring the role of immunity in understanding and addressing these uncertainties.
Since the end of 2019, a new, dangerous virus has caused the deaths of more than 3 million people. Efforts to fight the disease remain multifaceted and include prophylactic strategies (vaccines), the development of antiviral drugs targeting replication, and the mitigation of the damage associated with exacerbated immune responses (e.g., interleukin-6-receptor inhibitors). However, numerous uncertainties remain, making it difficult to lower the mortality rate, especially among critically ill patients. While looking for a new means of understanding the pathomechanisms of the disease, we asked a question-is our immunity key to resolving these uncertainties? In this review, we attempt to answer this question, and summarize, interpret, and discuss the available knowledge concerning the interplay between neutrophils, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and T-cells in COVID-19. These are considered to be the first line of defense against pathogens and, thus, we chose to emphasize their role in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although immunologic alterations are the subject of constant research, they are poorly understood and often underestimated. This review provides background information for the expansion of research on the novel, immunity-oriented approach to diagnostic and treatment possibilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据