4.6 Review

Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 Technology to Genome Editing in Glioblastoma Multiforme

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10092342

关键词

glioblastoma multiforme (GBM); CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing; apoptosis; proliferation; autophagy; angiogenesis; cell invasion and migration

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA) [CA-091460, NS-057811]
  2. State of South Carolina (Columbia, SC, USA) [SCIRF-2020-PD-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing is crucial in elucidating the genetic regulators of GBM, particularly in vitro systems for identifying novel transcriptional regulators, while in vivo research requires further exploration.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive malignancy of the brain and spinal cord with a poor life expectancy. The low survivability of GBM patients can be attributed, in part, to its heterogeneity and the presence of multiple genetic alterations causing rapid tumor growth and resistance to conventional therapy. The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR associated (Cas) nuclease 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) system is a cost-effective and reliable gene editing technology, which is widely used in cancer research. It leads to novel discoveries of various oncogenes that regulate autophagy, angiogenesis, and invasion and play important role in pathogenesis of various malignancies, including GBM. In this review article, we first describe the principle and methods of delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Second, we summarize the current knowledge and major applications of CRISPR-Cas9 to identifying and modifying the genetic regulators of the hallmark of GBM. Lastly, we elucidate the major limitations of current CRISPR-Cas9 technology in the GBM field and the future perspectives. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing aids in identifying novel coding and non-coding transcriptional regulators of the hallmarks of GBM particularly in vitro, while work using in vivo systems requires further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据