4.6 Review

Hydrogen Sulfide Metabolism and Pulmonary Hypertension

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10061477

关键词

pulmonary hypertension; hydrogen sulfide; vascular remodeling; vascular reactivity; oxidative stress; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulmonary hypertension is a severe disease with no curative treatment available, but hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has been shown to have protective effects against it by regulating hypoxia response and mitochondrial bioenergetics, among other pathways. This suggests that H2S could be a relevant target for new therapeutic strategies.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a severe and multifactorial disease characterized by a progressive elevation of pulmonary arterial resistance and pressure due to remodeling, inflammation, oxidative stress, and vasoreactive alterations of pulmonary arteries (PAs). Currently, the etiology of these pathological features is not clearly understood and, therefore, no curative treatment is available. Since the 1990s, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has been described as the third gasotransmitter with plethoric regulatory functions in cardiovascular tissues, especially in pulmonary circulation. Alteration in H2S biogenesis has been associated with the hallmarks of PH. H2S is also involved in pulmonary vascular cell homeostasis via the regulation of hypoxia response and mitochondrial bioenergetics, which are critical phenomena affected during the development of PH. In addition, H2S modulates ATP-sensitive K+ channel (K-ATP) activity, and is associated with PA relaxation. In vitro or in vivo H2S supplementation exerts antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, and reduces PA remodeling. Altogether, current findings suggest that H2S promotes protective effects against PH, and could be a relevant target for a new therapeutic strategy, using attractive H2S-releasing molecules. Thus, the present review discusses the involvement and dysregulation of H2S metabolism in pulmonary circulation pathophysiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据