相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Cancer Statistics, 2021
Rebecca L. Siegel et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2021)
Completion of radical hysterectomy does not improve survival of patients with cervical cancer and intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement: ABRAX international retrospective cohort study
D. Cibula et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2021)
Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
Hyuna Sung et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2021)
Prediction of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Korea, 2021
Kyu-Won Jung et al.
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2021)
Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size < 2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study
Pengfei Li et al.
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2021)
Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and prognosis: Opportunities and challenges
Shigao Huang et al.
CANCER LETTERS (2020)
Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study
Shitanshu Uppal et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2020)
Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Sungmin Woo et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2020)
SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer
Luis Chiva et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2020)
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Roni Nitecki et al.
JAMA ONCOLOGY (2020)
Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution
David W. Doo et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)
Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028)
E. Sun Paik et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models
Evangelia Christodoulou et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma: Interpreting the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer Trial Results
Krishnansu S. Tewari
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2019)
Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea
Se Ik Kim et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)
Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer
Se Ik Kim et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri
Neerja Bhatla et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS (2019)
Incidence of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in Korea during 1999-2015
Myong Cheol Lim et al.
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)
Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement
Miseon Kim et al.
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2019)
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer
David Cibula et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2018)
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
Pedro T. Ramirez et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
Alexander Melamed et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Practice guidelines for management of cervical cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement
Myong Cheol Lim et al.
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2017)
The value of advanced MRI techniques in the assessment of cervical cancer: a review
Evelyn Dappa et al.
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING (2017)
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study
Wei Wang et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER (2016)
The Added Role of MR Imaging in Treatment Stratification of Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What the Radiologist Needs to Know
Evis Sala et al.
RADIOLOGY (2013)
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study
J. -H. Nam et al.
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY (2012)
A MicroRNA Expression Signature for Cervical Cancer Prognosis
Xiaoxia Hu et al.
CANCER RESEARCH (2010)
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. A. Eisenhauer et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2009)
Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation-ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and Interobserver variability
Hedvig Hricak et al.
RADIOLOGY (2007)
Early invasive cervical cancer: Tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study
Donald G. Mitchell et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2006)
分享论文
