4.6 Review

Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Curative-Intent Hepatectomy Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

期刊

CANCERS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122984

关键词

transarterial chemoembolization; lipiodol; hepatic artery; embolization; liver resection; hepatic resection

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of postoperative TACE after liver resection for HCC is still unclear, with existing evidence suggesting potential benefits but limited to Eastern Asian populations. High-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the oncologic benefits and applicability of adjuvant TACE.
Simple Summary The role of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature and compared the survival outcomes of TACE vs. no TACE after liver resection for HCC. While the existing evidence suggests a benefit of adjuvant TACE, published trials to date are at significant risk of bias and limited to Eastern Asian patients. High-quality randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the oncologic benefits of adjuvant TACE. The role of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing hepatectomy is currently unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Random-effects meta-analysis was carried out to compare the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with resectable HCC undergoing hepatectomy followed by adjuvant TACE vs. hepatectomy alone in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the effect of hepatitis B viral status, microvascular invasion, type of resection (anatomic vs. parenchymal-sparing), and tumor size on the outcomes. Ten eligible RCTs, reporting on 1216 patients in total, were identified. The combination of hepatectomy and adjuvant TACE was associated with superior OS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52 to 0.85; p < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.88; p < 0.001) compared to hepatectomy alone. There were significant concerns regarding the risk of bias in most of the included studies. Overall, adjuvant TACE may be associated with an oncologic benefit in select HCC patients. However, the applicability of these findings may be limited to Eastern Asian populations, due to the geographically restricted sample. High-quality multinational RCTs, as well as predictive tools to optimize patient selection, are necessary before adjuvant TACE can be routinely implemented into standard practice. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD42021245758.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据