4.6 Review

Targeting CDK9 for the Treatment of Glioblastoma

期刊

CANCERS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123039

关键词

glioblastoma; CDK9 inhibitor; clinical trial

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute's Intramural Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibiting CDK9 can impact cancer cell survival pathways and may improve clinical outcomes, especially in highly resistant cancers like glioblastoma.
Simple Summary Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) can impact multiple survival pathways in cancers and may be a promising therapeutic approach for glioblastoma, which is known to be highly resistant to treatments and thus challenging to treat. This review assesses the mechanisms by which CDK9 inhibition impacts cancer cell survival pathways in glioblastoma and other cancer types and presents results from clinical trials involving CDK9 inhibitors. A more thorough understanding of these mechanisms may lead to novel combination treatment strategies involving CDK9 inhibitors that can ultimately improve clinical outcomes for glioblastoma patients. Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor, and more than two-thirds of patients with glioblastoma die within two years of diagnosis. The challenges of treating this disease mainly include genetic and microenvironmental features that often render the tumor resistant to treatments. Despite extensive research efforts, only a small number of drugs tested in clinical trials have become therapies for patients. Targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) is an emerging therapeutic approach that has the potential to overcome the challenges in glioblastoma management. Here, we discuss how CDK9 inhibition can impact transcription, metabolism, DNA damage repair, epigenetics, and the immune response to facilitate an anti-tumor response. Moreover, we discuss small-molecule inhibitors of CDK9 in clinical trials and future perspectives on the use of CDK9 inhibitors in treating patients with glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据